home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT2009>
- <title>
- July 05, 1993: Seagal Under Siege
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- July 05, 1993 Hitting Back At Terrorists
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- PRESS, Page 55
- Seagal Under Siege
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Facing a blistering profile in Spy magazine, movie star Steven
- Seagal counters by suing the writer for slander
- </p>
- <p>By RICHARD CORLISS--With reporting by Jeffrey Ressner/Los Angeles
- </p>
- <p> You wouldn't dare say this in their presence--if you're smart,
- you won't invite them to the same planet--but Steven Seagal
- and Spy magazine have a few things in common.
- </p>
- <p> Both leaped to prominence in the late Reagan years: Seagal as
- a from-nowhere star in his first movie (Above the Law), Spy
- as the hipper-than-thou champion of attitude journalism. Both
- like to make fun of short people. Both offered sleek twists
- on tired genres: Seagal the martial-arts movie, Spy the glossy
- gossip rag. Both are deeply indebted to Creative Artists Agency
- boss Michael Ovitz, who is Seagal's movie mentor and Spy's eternal
- obsession. And both have sturdy Time Warner credentials: Seagal
- as one of Warner Bros.' most reliable moneymakers (Hard to Kill,
- Under Siege) and Spy as a publication founded by former TIME
- writers Kurt Andersen (now back at TIME as editor at large)
- and E. Graydon Carter.
- </p>
- <p> If the sleepy-eyed star and representatives of Spy get together
- soon, it won't be to swap Separated at Birth stories but to
- stare one another down in court. Seagal, a sixth-degree black
- belt in aikido, is steamed by the prospect of a blistering profile
- written by John Connolly, a former New York City police detective.
- The article, to be published this week, alleges that Seagal
- associates with gangsters and that he offered money to ex-intelligence
- agents to have one of his adversaries entrapped and two others
- murdered.
- </p>
- <p> "Steven won't talk, on or off the record," says a Seagal spokesman.
- Neither will Ovitz. And Warner Bros. publicity chief Robert
- Friedman will say only that Seagal is "an extremely cooperative
- filmmaker and actor who's a pleasure to do business with." But
- on April 16, when Connolly was still compiling his article,
- the star filed a slander suit against the writer and Robert
- Strickland, a former Seagal friend and Connolly's main source.
- According to Seagal's attorney, Martin Singer, Strickland had
- been harassing and defaming the actor. Singer contends that
- Connolly, in his interviewing for the Spy story, made "wild,
- fabricated statements about our client, trying to damage his
- reputation in the industry. We have reason to believe these
- are the same wild stories Mr. Strickland came up with." In a
- motion to strike the complaint, Connolly denied slandering Seagal,
- and Spy joined him in accusing the star of attempting prior
- restraint of the article.
- </p>
- <p> Seagal used to enjoy hinting mysteriously about the "special
- work and favors" he did for "many powerful people" in Asia in
- the '70s. Sounds suitably spooky. "Steven likes to be at the
- cutting edge of the unsaid truths about `how the world works,'
- " says director Andrew Davis (Above the Law, Under Siege). "He
- enjoys that kind of stuff...He tries to live it." But Strickland
- and Gary Goldman, an ex-mercenary who worked on a Seagal script
- before falling out with the star, have insisted that Seagal
- purloined these life-or-death exploits from actual agents. Writer
- Alan Richman addressed these questions in a 1991 GQ article
- that nettled Seagal. Spy asserts it was Richman, a heterosexual,
- whom Seagal wanted framed in a homosexual encounter, and that
- Goldman was one of those whom Seagal wanted killed.
- </p>
- <p> Perhaps there is another Spy-Seagal similarity here. Both are
- adept at high-wire innuendo--Spy as a key to its satirical
- japery, Seagal as a spur to his myth. If he did make these remarks,
- he may have intended them as macho provocations, as sick jokes
- or as acid tests--the ultimate Spy prank.
- </p>
- <p> Connolly has other hairy charges: that Seagal was a bigamist
- when he was courting his current wife, actress Kelly LeBrock;
- that two female aides were paid to keep quiet about his sexual
- harassment of them; that among his friends are kinfolk of various
- godfathers and gonifs. "Steven likes to hang out with the underworld
- of espionage," says J.F. Lawton, who wrote Under Siege, "and
- maybe also of crime. But I don't see Steven rubbing anyone out.
- And if you have Michael Ovitz behind you, you don't really need
- the Mob."
- </p>
- <p> Connolly, whose piece mixes seemingly meticulous research with
- some sloppy checking (author Joe Hyams is confused with a Warner
- executive who has the same name), spoke with Seagal's ex-wives
- and other sources. But his star witness is Strickland, a former
- CIA agent who suffers from depression and has been institutionalized
- 11 times. Nonetheless, Strickland's psychiatrist, Dr. Paul Ackerman
- of Los Angeles, says he "is not insane, has absolutely no delusions
- or hallucinations." Today Strickland is in hiding, because,
- he says, "I think Steven's dangerous. He's got the money and
- some very near-the-edge people who follow him around." Yet he
- believes that Seagal would not personally carry out acts of
- violence, "because he's a very timid guy. I've seen him back
- down when he was confronted."
- </p>
- <p> Spy, which has long had an edgy relationship with movie stars--it has made its reputation by soiling theirs--may soon
- find out if Steven Seagal is dangerous or timid. Both the star
- and the magazine are under siege and out for justice.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-